That’s Just Pathetic!

Your Character Looks on the Bright Side?

“Pathetic fallacy” is the posh academic term that refers to the technique of ascribing human emotions to inanimate objects, usually to reflect a character’s mood. For example, say your protagonist falls in love; you might describe flowers laughing and trees waving their branches gleefully. Or perhaps there’s been a loss, and suddenly the landscape looks bleak and there’s rain and clouds a-brewin.

“Pathetic fallacy” was very popular with the Victorian novelists – I always think of Thomas Hardy when asked to give an example. Therein, however, lies the problem – “pathetic fallacy” is a little out of fashion nowadays. This demise is partly due to the modern attention span. If you’ve ever read novels by the Brontes, Dickens, Elliot or Hardy – you’ll know all about lengthy landscape description and frankly, how dull it can be for modern readers. If you absolutely need to say how each field in the valley looked, then spread your descriptions out over the course of your work. Above all, as Elmore Leonard wrote, “Try to leave out the part that readers tend to skip.”

Another reason “pathetic fallacy” is no longer de rigueur in the literary world, is that it can seem a tad cliché. For example, if your protag is heading home to see his wife and there’s a storm, and they fight… yawn. Your foreshadowing’s is derivative, predictable and boring.

Still, “pathetic fallacy” has its place in the literary toolbox. It can provide emphasis for mood. I suggest using it sparingly, with caution and avoid storm/argument, rain/depression, sunny days/falling-in-love clichés.

Personally, I like to turn PF on its head and have my character see beauty in rain or trouble in sunshine or make a storm a symbol of peace. In short, my advice would be to use PF by all means, but when you do, surprise your reader.

Oh, and whatever you do, never open with a “pathetic fallacy” weather report. That’s the biggest cliché in the cliché box. I mean, it’s just pathetic : )

There's a Storm Comin'

Advertisements

About suehealy

Award-winning Irish writer/playwright Sue Healy’s work has been supported and developed by Dublin’s Abbey Theatre, the Peggy Ramsay Foundation and Arts Council England. Her full-length stage plays include Cow (Etcetera Theatre, 2017) and Brazen (King’s Head Theatre, 2016), funded by Arts Council England. Sue’s work has also been performed at the Finborough, Arcola, Hackney Attic and Sterts theatres, and at festivals including the Claremorris Fringe (New Writing Award winner), the Brighton (Sussex Playwrights’ Award winner), the UEA Contemporary European Drama Festival, Norwich. December 2017 will see her work showcased at the Criterion theatre in London. Radio work includes nine plays broadcast on BBC Radio 4 (Opening Lines winner), WLRfm and KCLR96fm. She has been a finalist for BBC Scriptroom 12, Eamon Keane Playwriting Prize, Nick Darke Award and the Old Vic 12 New Voices. Sue's prose has won the the Molly Keane Award, HISSAC Prize, Escalator Award and has been published widely. Sue has been writer-in-residence on Inis Oírr, Aran Islands, and at the Heinrich Boll Cottage on Achill Island. She has also benefitted from juried artist residencies at the Tyrone Guthrie Centre, and at Ginestrelle, Assisi in Italy. Sue is a UEA Creative Writing MA alumna. She spent eleven years in Budapest, editing Hungary A.M. She is currently London-based, completing a Ph.D. on the Royal Court Theatre. Sue is an Associate Lecturer in Playwriting at the Universities of Lincoln and Portsmouth, and tutors Creative Writing at City Lit. She is Literary Manager at the Finborough Theatre. View all posts by suehealy

20 responses to “That’s Just Pathetic!

  • sueannbowlingauthor

    Unless the weather is part of the plot (such as attempted murder by weather control.) And cliches can also be turned on their head by recognizing them.
    as cliches.

  • elainecougler

    Sounds good to me, Sue. And it’s cloudy and dark here!

  • derekberry

    This post reminds me of “The Story of an Hour” by Chopin, where the character hears about her husband’s death, but then it’s a beautiful day outside.
    Back in the day, I agree, it was a great tool. But it has become cliche. As bad as “On a dark and stormy night…”

  • Carol Lovekin

    Since rain is a motif running through my novel in revision, & one of my characters is more misery-ridden than a wet day in Wales, I read you & pause. (Unlike the wind outside my window.)

    *Thinks* Am I writing a ‘cliché? I don’t believe so. I am writing a good deal of descriptive prose mind & can only hope it won’t be ‘…the part that readers tend to skip.’

    All that apart, your words are food for thought… Chocolate I think – I’m borderline depressed now.. 😉

    • suehealy

      Yikes, Carol – did not mean to depress or dishearten… and I’m sure your novel is not cliche. My only advice is to make sure you write it well and in an interesting and surprising way and make sure that your descriptions serve a purpose and aren’t just thrown at the text for the helluvit.

  • Carol Lovekin

    Lol! No harm done, Sue – my tongue was very firmly in my cheek!

    It is interesting though – the cliché issue. When I began writing this book I was aware that a story about rain, set in Wales, for goodness sake, is straight away asking to be questioned.

    (I ate the chocolate & carried on revising… And beat the pesky WordPress widgets into submission too. So all is well.)

    • suehealy

      Phew, the last thing I want to do is discourage – it’s far too difficult to keep motivated as it is, in the writing game. There are books, of course, that have done a fine job of incorporating the weather in the story – have you read Miss Smila’s Feeling For Snow? The point is that it is a main feature of the story and not flung at the piece as ‘sunny day” or ‘stormy night’ wallpaper. And eating chocolate is such a good accompaniment to revision, I’m with you all the way on that one.

  • catwoods

    Sue,

    Thanks for stopping by my blog and allowing me to follow you here. Nice post on a nice blog! Not to mention the picture is stunning.

    I tend to use weather as an antagonist rather than a reflection of character mood. Great reminder to corral the cliches.

    ~cat

  • Sean McGuire

    It’s sad that the modern attention span won’t allow for a good, artsy paragraph. Don’t get me wrong. I relish the challenge of picking one perfect phrase, and finding the perfect place to put it… but it would be nice to get away with more expansive descriptions. Hang the pace!

    • suehealy

      Hi Sean, I know and appreciate what you mean. However, I have to admit, I’m guilty of skipping pars myself. We’re wired differently these days, I guess. In the nineteenth century, time moved at a different pace it seems and people could take time to appreciate the prose. If you enjoy them I think that’s a good thing.

    • Carol Lovekin

      @ Sean: Yes! For me it’s about balance – the ‘perfect phrase’ AND evocative prose passages. And I think it’s possible to write the latter *with* pace.

      • Sean McGuire

        Sue: It makes the 19th century sound like an idyll. I almost want to go there, but nobody ever gains anything by going backwards. Or do they…

        Carol: I think so. A good writer explores as many options as possible.

  • Neeks

    It’s ironic that the very thing (communications technology) that causes us to skim articles and such (busy busy so much to read and do) are also a huge way to be seen by the masses.

  • Freedom, by the way

    Interesting. I still like to pick up a Dickens novel once in a while. And I do think that Rosamund Pilcher is very descriptive and weather always plays a role in her books. I love her books but then her character development is wonderful, as well. Maybe I’m a fuddy-duddy but the really sparse writing in some best sellers really turns me off. But your are right, most people don’t want to read long, descrptive paragraphs anymore.
    See? My comment is too long by at least 3 sentences.

  • suehealy

    ; ) your comment is not too long and it makes a very good point. There are, as has been said, some modern writers who wield well the PF tool, I think the key is to think carefully before you use it and never start describing how sunny the sunshine is because your character is happy – as it smacks of unoriginal and lazy writing. Rosamund Pilcher as you mention is anything but.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: